Name: Fredrick "David" Haase

Age: 66

Political party: Libertarian

Where you live: Anchorage

Number of years in Alaska: 14

Occupation: Real Estate

David was the first of four boys born of Fred and Anne Haase of Colorado Springs Colorado. He was born 10 month after Pearl Harbor and learned early in life if you want something you work for it. Purchased his first bicycle by picking beans at age 9 and his first car at age 15. Growing up, David always had a job or two after school, weekends and most of the summer. Lumber mills, newspapers, construction When the draft board called he was 21 years old, the father of one and the job assistant manager at a department store his fourth store. That was David's last employment before the Army, where his mission was to inspect all subsistent (food) moving through the Atlanta Army Depot; and later to train and advise the Commander and his troops in nuclear, chemical and biological defense. In the Army National Guard his mission was Military recruitment. David has been a self starter all his life self employed and doing what he wanted to at the time. The business of Real Estate was David's first passion, starting in Georgia; David has been involved in a real estate transaction in 48 of the 50 states and dealt in all types of real estate. When the leader of the Libertarian Party invited David to run for the U.S. Senate David ask himself why not?  He wants to keep the Libertarian party on the ballot in Alaska; he needs 3% of the vote. To help save the nation from big government debt he needs the most votes.





 

 

The Denali Commission should be continued and the federal government should loan state and local government money for worthy projects interest free.

Generally I do not support mandatory anything. I have seen the air quality go from barely breathable to not bad in Los Angeles so I know they do help. What I do not want is to see our industrial base move to other countries, where they do not have to abide by the same standards.

We are going to need agreements with our northern neighbors on shipping for sure. What all the challenges will be is hard to say at this time.

I have not seen anything that would lead me to think it has been abused. They certainly have the assets to make good on a bid that turns out to be to low.

Earmarks are getting a lot of bad press lately, but they are essential to how the government works. I will never support secret earmarks, pork belly and other secret schemes. They need to be out in the open for all to see.

 

Survey
  1. Recent polls show the No. 1 concern of voters at the moment is the soaring price of gasoline, which is tied to record high crude oil prices. How would you address rising energy prices in the short term and what actions do you think Congress should take on energy policy in the long run?

  2. The faltering economy, weakening dollar and growing unemployment are spurring middle-class concern about the future and whether they can maintain their current standard of living. What can Congress do to shore up the economy and reverse job loss?

  3. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have gone on now longer than World War II. Should the United States continue its military campaigns in those countries and, if so, for how long? If the wars are to continue, would you support a national draft?

  4. More and more American soldiers are returning from the wars with lifelong injuries, yet Congress and the president continue to disagree on funding for veterans services. What, if any, changes should be made to the health care and benefits veterans receive and how would any increases be funded?

  5. The high cost of health care continually ranks as one of the top concerns of Americans. Does the current health care and insurance system need to be changed?

  6. How can health care for Alaska Natives best be improved, especially in rural communities?

  7. What, if anything, would you change about federal law governing abortions?

  8. The use of congressional earmarks to fund state projects has been a major point of contention. Do you support the use of earmarks? If so, how should the system be altered to reduce abuse?

  9. Does the Endangered Species Act, as it is currently interpreted by environmental groups and the federal judiciary, and the listing of the polar bear present a threat to the economic future of Alaska? If not, why? If so, what changes would you support in Congress to address the issue?

  10. For any policies that would require increased spending, how would you pay for them?

  11. Should Congress continue to provide funding for the bypass mail system? If not, should some form of subsidy be provided to maintain air service in rural communities?

  12. The ability of Alaska Native corporations to receive preference for federal contracts under the 8A program is currently causing a stir on Capitol Hill. Has the program been abused in Alaska? Should it be changed?

  13. Funding for the Denali Commission regularly comes under fire in Congress. Has the commission been a success and should it be continued? How would you pay for rural infrastructure projects, such as water and sewer projects, fuel tank farms and ports?

  14. Do you support efforts to place a mandatory cap on greenhouse gas emissions? How would you reduce the impact of such a cap on the national economy?

  15. Warming global temperatures are opening up new opportunities for resource development and shipping in the Arctic, as well as new challenges. What changes to Arctic policy does Congress need to enact and how do they affect Alaska?

 

Note: You should save a copy of your answers for your own use if you wish before clicking the submit button. Our server does not save these answers in a way that you will be able to access them again.